Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v14 9/9] avcodec/evc: Changes in Changelog and MAINTAINERS files

[Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4588 bytes --]

On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:17:15PM +0200, Lynne wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Oct 24, 2022, 18:29 by jamrial@gmail.com:
> 
> > On 10/24/2022 12:56 PM, Lynne wrote:
> >
> >> Oct 24, 2022, 09:42 by d.kozinski@samsung.com:
> >>
> >>> - Changelog update
> >>> - MAINTAINERS update
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Dawid Kozinski <d.kozinski@samsung.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  Changelog   | 3 ++-
> >>>  MAINTAINERS | 5 +++++
> >>>  2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/Changelog b/Changelog
> >>> index ec9de1bd85..19e9ae3b1f 100644
> >>> --- a/Changelog
> >>> +++ b/Changelog
> >>> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ version 5.1:
> >>>  - remap_opencl filter
> >>>  - added chromakey_cuda filter
> >>>  - added bilateral_cuda filter
> >>> +- eXtra-fast Essential Video Encoder (XEVE)
> >>> +- eXtra-fast Essential Video Decoder (XEVD)
> >>>  version 5.0:
> >>> @@ -92,7 +94,6 @@ version 5.0:
> >>>  - anlmf audio filter
> >>>  - IMF demuxer (experimental)
> >>>  -
> >>>  version 4.4:
> >>>  - AudioToolbox output device
> >>>  - MacCaption demuxer
> >>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> >>> index eebfa5cfb7..df8d8eca73 100644
> >>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> >>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> >>> @@ -200,6 +200,8 @@ Codecs:
> >>>  libvpx*                               James Zern
> >>>  libxavs.c                             Stefan Gehrer
> >>>  libxavs2.c                            Huiwen Ren
> >>> +  libxevd.c                             Dawid Kozinski
> >>> +  libxeve.c,                            Dawid Kozinski
> >>>  libzvbi-teletextdec.c                 Marton Balint
> >>>  lzo.h, lzo.c                          Reimar Doeffinger
> >>>  mdec.c                                Michael Niedermayer
> >>> @@ -420,6 +422,9 @@ Muxers/Demuxers:
> >>>  dv.c                                  Roman Shaposhnik
> >>>  electronicarts.c                      Peter Ross
> >>>  epafdec.c                             Paul B Mahol
> >>> +  evc.c, evc.h                          Dawid Kozinski
> >>> +  evcdec.c                              Dawid Kozinski
> >>> +  evc_parser.c                          Dawid Kozinski
> >>>  ffm*                                  Baptiste Coudurier
> >>>  flic.c                                Mike Melanson
> >>>  flvdec.c                              Michael Niedermayer
> >>>
> >>
> >> Nak, that list is only for those with push access, and no
> >> other changes may be made in the same patch.
> >>
> >
> > No, it's the other way around. Those in this list may be eligible for push access.
> > Being listed here gives them the right to NAK a patch made for a module they maintain, as well as their approval being (ideally) a requirement before making changes to it.
> >
> 

> Nope. Michael will give anyone on the list push access.

I have the feeling you dont trust me
if thats the issue, 2 lists will not fix that

The idea is that each developer who takes care of a bit of the code base
(reviewing patches, approving them, fixing issues, adding features, ...)
has the same rights as others.
That is git write, the list is the MAINAINERs list.

Its not really true that everyone in that file has write access because
some people where forgotten and never asked, some simply dont know git well
enough, some explicitly said they do not want git write, some sent a lot of
messy patches and gave me pause so i didnt offer it and they also didnt ask.
The list should be pretty close though, these are all exceptions not the rule.

I fail to see the problem, btw.
A Problem would be if someoe does something that requires to remove his git
write or that requires us to think about "should we close that write account"
(and yes i ignore here cases where core developers dont get along, thats not
 a issue for a maintainer/git write list)
If we do not hit a situation where we consider closing an account then IMO
we havnt really had a problem with giving write access out too liberal.
The other side OTOH certainly has occured, people sending patches over and
over again, pinging over and over again and finally the patch is found to be ok
and applied. That would point more toward too little write permission, or at least
not the right person having write access, or a lack of incentives to review and apply
patches

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

In fact, the RIAA has been known to suggest that students drop out
of college or go to community college in order to be able to afford
settlements. -- The RIAA

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".