Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 34/39] avcodec/mpegvideoencdsp: Allow pointers to const where possible

[Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3815 bytes --]

On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 11:30:39AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-07-30 19:12:39)
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 11:55:45AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> > > Michael Niedermayer:
> > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 12:08:09AM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote:
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinhardt@outlook.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >>  libavcodec/arm/mpegvideoencdsp_init_arm.c  |  4 ++--
> > > >>  libavcodec/mips/h263dsp_mips.h             |  2 +-
> > > >>  libavcodec/mips/mpegvideoencdsp_msa.c      |  4 ++--
> > > >>  libavcodec/mpegvideoencdsp.c               | 10 +++++-----
> > > >>  libavcodec/mpegvideoencdsp.h               | 10 +++++-----
> > > >>  libavcodec/ppc/mpegvideoencdsp.c           |  8 ++++----
> > > >>  libavcodec/x86/mpegvideoenc_qns_template.c |  4 ++--
> > > >>  libavcodec/x86/mpegvideoencdsp.asm         |  4 ++--
> > > >>  libavcodec/x86/mpegvideoencdsp_init.c      |  6 +++---
> > > >>  9 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > LGTM, also all similar things should be ok
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, it is not so easy. The first version of this patchset
> > > (this here) forgot to update the definitions of several loongarch
> > > functions, leading to lots of red on patchwork. The second version fixed
> > > the compilation error, but forgot some constifications due to
> > > unfortunate oversights. For the third version, I wanted to actually
> > > compile loongarch instead of just staring at the code; but the
> > > GCC-cross-compiler does not seem to support lsx and lasx (and looking at
> > > the loongarch-code in GCC makes me believe that they are just not
> > > supported (yet)). Therefore I resorted to creating dummy-functions for
> > > all the __lasx_* and __lsx_* functions (they show no more
> > > const-warnings). I wanted to let the FATE-loongarch-box test this once
> > > more (and tell me whether there are still any issues left), yet this box
> > > is no longer active since a few days (for reasons unknown). Can you
> > > compile the lsx and lasx code (after all, you committed all the
> > > loongarch code)?
> > 
> > i have no easy way to test loongarch, what i can test is qemu-mips.
> > i think i have said that a few times already.
> > 
> > I do have a loongson box that is IIRC ready to be shipped (within EU) to
> > whoever volunteers to maintain that box for FFmpeg. I dont know if that
> > box would help with the current code. The OS will liklely need to be updated
> > and IIRC this has no normal update mechanism) I didnt touch this box for a
> > really long time.
> 
> What OS is it?

looking thorugh past emails (so i dont have to get the box and unpack it again)

its some custom fedora/redhat
that additional info i found while double checking the OS:

 according to /proc/cpuinfo, 4 core
 system type             : lst-loongson3-eva
 machine                 : Unknown
 processor               : 0
 cpu model               : ICT Loongson-3A V0.5  FPU V0.1
 BogoMIPS                : 717.28
 ...
 with 500gb 7200rpm WD Caviar Blue HDD
 4gb memory


> 
> I could conceivably host such a machine and give other devs SSH access
> to it, if it does not require too much maintenance and/or electricity.

given the tiny heatsink/fan on the CPU i dont think it would require alot of power
send me teh target address and ill get it shipped to you assuming the box is still where
it was and i find it

thx


[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Into a blind darkness they enter who follow after the Ignorance,
they as if into a greater darkness enter who devote themselves
to the Knowledge alone. -- Isha Upanishad

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".