On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 09:01:03PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
[...]
> > If we add a XML parser to FFmpeg. Such a thing would be used by several
> > bits and we need to ensure it has redundant maintainership.
> > So i think a xml parser needs broad support by developers otherwise we
> > run the risk that if it has a single maintainer only and that maintainer
> > stops maintaining it that could be annoying to more than just the parser
> > itself.
> > I cannot remember exactly without re-reading the old thread what the issues
> > people had with the xml parser. If it was some component of it or in general.
> > But i think its mostly a question if theres more than one person who wants
> > to maintain it.
> 
> There is nothing to re-read:
> 
> https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2022-May/thread.html#296107
> 
> Nobody answered. Even to send files to make sure they would be
> supported.

that says "WIP" in the subject. I think some people when they see WIP they
skip it and wait for a final version to review.

thx

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

The real ebay dictionary, page 2
"100% positive feedback" - "All either got their money back or didnt complain"
"Best seller ever, very honest" - "Seller refunded buyer after failed scam"