Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v4] avutil/csp: create avpriv API for colorspace structs
Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 15:23:52 +0200
Message-ID: <20220520132352.GV396728@pb2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1d00bdb9-cf77-aa08-1799-db77d2548d0c@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4423 bytes --]

On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 08:53:35AM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/20/2022 7:28 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:27:48PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 08:23:38PM +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 11:18:17AM -0400, Leo Izen wrote:
> > > > > This commit moves some of the functionality from avfilter/colorspace
> > > > > into avutil/csp and exposes it as an avpriv API so it can be used by
> > > > > libavcodec and/or libavformat.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > +#ifndef AVUTIL_CSP_H
> > > > > +#define AVUTIL_CSP_H
> > > > > +
> > > > > +#include "libavutil/pixfmt.h"
> > > > > +
> > > > > +typedef struct AVLumaCoefficients {
> > > > > +    double cr, cg, cb;
> > > > > +} AVLumaCoefficients;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +typedef struct AVPrimaryCoefficients {
> > > > > +    double xr, yr, xg, yg, xb, yb;
> > > > > +} AVPrimaryCoefficients;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +typedef struct AVWhitepointCoefficients {
> > > > > +    double xw, yw;
> > > > > +} AVWhitepointCoefficients;
> > > > 
> > > > As said, these should not be floating point.
> > > > Adding a new public API and changing it later is messy, this
> > > > should be changed before its made public
> > > 
> > > i now see you replaced some public by avpriv in the latest patch
> > > but still i think this should be changed to fixed point or AVRational
> > > first. Even as API between the libs its messy to change it later
> > > it would require us to keep the double API when its changed until
> > > the next major bump
> > 
> > I see some discussion related to this on the IRC log from when i was
> > sleeping. Maybe it would be better to keep this on the mailing list
> > 
> > Also iam not sure my concern was clearly worded so ill sort my argument
> > and concerns so its clearer below:
> > 
> > 1. exactly representing values
> >      if you have a 0.1 you can represent that exactly as AVRational 1/10 but
> >      maybe shockingly a double cannot.
> >      Try a printf %f of 0.1 and it will do 0.100000 looks good but thats deception
> >      try that with more precission %100.99f shows this:
> >      0.100000000000000005551115123125782702118158340454101562500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> >      so if we want to use exactly the values from the spec, doubles with a
> >      unit/base of 1 do not work.
> >      int or even doubles with a base/unit of 30000 might work exactly if
> >      AVRational is unpopular. 30000 instead of 10000 is for that one pesky 1/3
> > 1b. the exact value that 0.1 has in float/double depends on the precission
> >      IEEE float
> >      0.100000001490116119384765625000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> >      IEEE double
> >      0.100000000000000005551115123125782702118158340454101562500000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> >      long double
> >      0.100000000000000000001355252715606880542509316001087427139282226562500000000000000000000000000000000
> >      So there will be slight differences if (intermediate) types anywhere arent
> >      exactly the same
> > 
> > 2. someone said, you need to pick a denominator when doing float -> rational
> >      av_d2q() will pick the best denominator for you.
> > 
> > 3. avpriv_ vs av_
> >      avpriv is evil, it combines the pain of ABI/API compatibility while the
> >      public cant use it
> 
> Not making it public allows us to not commit to a fixed design *now*.
> Unless there's a clear need for this to be part of the public API, i don't
> think it's a good idea to do so. This change is being made because this API
> is afaict needed in lavc, and not by some project using lavu.
> 

> Removing/changing an avpriv symbol or struct is a matter or waiting for the
> nearest major bump. No need for an arbitrary 2 year wait period, compat
> wrappers, or anything crazy.

yes but is that really easier ?

sheduling changes to happen during a bump vs adding a warper+deprecating
at any time with a automatic #if removing code

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in physics you will never
get a job again.
If you fake or manipulate statistics in a paper in medicin you will get
a job for life at the pharma industry.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 251 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-20 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-18 15:18 Leo Izen
2022-05-18 18:23 ` Michael Niedermayer
2022-05-18 18:27   ` Michael Niedermayer
2022-05-20 10:28     ` Michael Niedermayer
2022-05-20 11:26       ` Ronald S. Bultje
2022-05-20 13:11         ` Michael Niedermayer
2022-05-20 13:39           ` Ronald S. Bultje
2022-05-20 11:53       ` James Almer
2022-05-20 13:23         ` Michael Niedermayer [this message]
2022-05-20 15:50         ` Anton Khirnov
2022-05-20 16:02           ` Leo Izen
2022-05-20 16:33         ` Niklas Haas
2022-05-20 12:08       ` Leo Izen
2022-05-20 17:20       ` Niklas Haas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220520132352.GV396728@pb2 \
    --to=michael@niedermayer.cc \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git