From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B5F426AC for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:40:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF9D68B26C; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:40:13 +0300 (EEST) Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net (relay12.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.232]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20DD68A302 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 21:40:07 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (213-47-68-29.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [213.47.68.29]) (Authenticated sender: michael@niedermayer.cc) by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1ADB200008 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2022 18:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:40:06 +0200 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20220425184006.GZ2829255@pb2> References: <20220423163611.GX2829255@pb2> <9c39d56f-9cf0-4f81-9e13-4bc1034cac3b@beta.fastmail.com> <20220425171946.GY2829255@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg 5.0 LTS vs 5.1 LTS X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8857386450543724035==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============8857386450543724035== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Wbx4RWxFzUHplmH+" Content-Disposition: inline --Wbx4RWxFzUHplmH+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 08:04:25PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > On Mon, 25 Apr 2022, at 19:19, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 01:51:26PM +0200, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, at 18:36, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >> > Do people prefer that 5.0 becomes LTS or the next (5.1) ? > >> > Or something else ? > >>=20 > >> My understanding of the consensus was; > >> - 5.0 in Dec/Jan > >> - 5.1 in Jul with API additions, but no ABI/behavior breakage > > > > yes >=20 > OK. >=20 > >> - 6.0 in Dec 22 with ABI/API/behavior breakage and while 5.1 becomes L= TS > > > > we could give 5.1 an LTS "tag" when its released already >=20 > I would mention it, tbh. >=20 > > also thers the possibility that by december we have nothing that really > > benefits from a ABI/API/behavior breakage. > > If that happens people might prefer 5.2 over 6.0 i dont know. >=20 > I think it would be clearer to accustom people that we have one big poten= tial change every year, at the same date. thats not a bad idea. Still bumping the sonames of the libs when there is no reason is not really nice. I dont know if we will have a reason in decem= ber thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is what and why we do it that matters, not just one of them. --Wbx4RWxFzUHplmH+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCYmbrAgAKCRBhHseHBAsP qxA1AJwN5U2macXK4mzSefANo0b0pp72nQCfbQxnVRwmR/wvU/kJNs/j+xRzPZE= =EZJ9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Wbx4RWxFzUHplmH+-- --===============8857386450543724035== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============8857386450543724035==--