On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:58:53PM +0100, Mark Gaiser wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 11:01 PM Michael Niedermayer <michael@niedermayer.cc>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 02:09:15PM +0100, Tomas Härdin wrote:
> > > sön 2022-02-27 klockan 15:29 +0100 skrev Mark Gaiser:
> > > > Ping 2....
> > > >
> > > > I'd really like to get this merged!
> > > > This kinda blocks me right now from proceeding with IPFS integration
> > > > in
> > > > Kodi, MPV and VLC. Implementations in those (who rely on ffmpeg) are
> > > > significantly easier once this patch is finally landed in ffmpeg.
> > >
> > > I'd like to hear at least one other dev chime in on this one
> >
> > what exactly are you not sure about ?
> > what exactly needs a 2nd look ?
> >
> 
> My assumption.
> In general just a second look by someone other than Tomas.
> And, as he was skeptical about this patch at first, likely another opinion
> if this makes sense to add in ffmpeg.
> To me it does very much but i'm biased :)

ipfs support makes sense to be added to ffmpeg. ive seen ipfs urls and ive
already been annoyed that some tools dont "just" work with them.
While if i compare this to many other formats which i have never seen
outside the context of FFmpeg. So from this biased single sample that i
am, ipfs seems more widespread and thats why iam in favor of its support

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
-- Albert Einstein