From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB8F42C02 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:31:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D2A68AC75; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:31:00 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.198]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578186801D5 for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 18:30:54 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (213-47-68-29.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [213.47.68.29]) (Authenticated sender: michael@niedermayer.cc) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40F6FC000D for ; Wed, 12 Jan 2022 16:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 17:30:51 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20220112163051.GJ2829255@pb2> References: <20220108163012.GF2829255@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 5.0 blocking issues X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6429758177030025241==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============6429758177030025241== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/hGUqk7xVD71M303" Content-Disposition: inline --/hGUqk7xVD71M303 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 07:37:03AM +0100, Lynne wrote: > 8 Jan 2022, 17:30 by michael@niedermayer.cc: >=20 > > Hi all > > > > This is a simple go/no go call > > if you know of something that still should go into 5.0 please reply here > > with a list of what you are working on and a timelimit until when you > > will be done with it > > > > if you think everything is ready for the release, then too feel free to > > reply (assuming few others said ok yet) this is not supposed to become a > > 100 reply thread with oks, just maybe 2-3 people confirming that noone > > is aware of things missing. > > > > I intend to do the release within 2-3 days of all "no go" things being > > resolved or timeouting > > > > thx > > >=20 > Both of elenril and mkver's patches got merged, isn't it > time to tag and make archives already? something is not working efficiently here There have been more replies here than from elenril and mkver also there have been over the ML multiple requests for backports to 5.0 today. (which may or may not be all unimportant) We do need a better way to detect when a branch is ready for release or master is ready to be branched. Iam really bad at keeping track of everything everyone asks to be included and then notice when it was included fully with nothing missing and no amendmends.=20 Maybe we could put a RELEASE_BLOCKER file in release branches in the future and everyone can list in it what needs to be done before the release and when something is done the person pushing would also remove that line from the file. for 5.0 now, i guess this is a 2nd go/no go call here anything else that I should wait for ? if not i will make the release _probably_ in the next 2-3 days or so (if nothing interferes) the 2nd thing is i certainly am not able to sit here for weeks and wait for some "make a release now" bell to ring and then jump and do the release. i wish i could but thats not something i can do nor is it something people would want me to do. For example i had a migraine 2 days ago and it certainly would not be helpfull to the release quality if i made the release on that day for example. thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB If the United States is serious about tackling the national security threat= s=20 related to an insecure 5G network, it needs to rethink the extent to which = it values corporate profits and government espionage over security.-Bruce Schn= eier --/hGUqk7xVD71M303 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCYd8COAAKCRBhHseHBAsP q1LRAJ9xiJPfQCghNOdbfDajtndES+4A1gCgjZ7xevBd052jfsvG5/dRcX4fSsw= =Pt1a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/hGUqk7xVD71M303-- --===============6429758177030025241== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============6429758177030025241==--