From: Andriy Gelman <andriy.gelman@gmail.com> To: Cameron Gutman <aicommander@gmail.com>, jc@kynesim.co.uk Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/v4l2_m2m_dec: dequeue frame if input isn't ready Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 11:56:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20220102165641.5fewafbspqf7wo5n@jackie> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20211228234135.p5rreo3orbo6axsr@jackie> On Tue, 28. Dec 18:41, Andriy Gelman wrote: > On Mon, 27. Dec 03:18, Cameron Gutman wrote: > > On 12/27/21 00:17, Andriy Gelman wrote: > > > On Tue, 14. Dec 02:12, Cameron Gutman wrote: > > >> The V4L2M2M API operates asynchronously, so multiple packets can > > >> be enqueued before getting a batch of frames back. Since it was > > >> only possible to receive a frame by submitting another packet, > > >> there wasn't a way to drain those excess output frames from when > > >> avcodec_receive_frame() returned AVERROR(EAGAIN). > > >> > > > > > >> In my testing, this change reduced decode latency of a real-time > > >> 60 FPS H.264 stream by approximately 10x (200ms -> 20ms) on a > > >> Raspberry Pi 4. > > > > > > I was doing some more tests today, but didn't have any luck dequeuing a frame > > > if ff_decode_get_packet() returned EAGAIN. > > > > Hmm, maybe there is something different about your test harness? > > I'm receiving 720p 60 FPS H.264 ES in real-time from the network. > > I used ffmpeg, i.e. > ./ffmpeg -codec:v h264_v4l2m2m -i 720p60.h264 -f null - > > Anyway, I applied your patch but just removed the comment on latency > because I couldn't reproduce it. > > > > > For each H.264 encoded frame I receive off the network, my basic > > approach is like this (simplified for brevity): > > > > avcodec_send_packet(&pkt); > > do { > > frame = av_frame_alloc(); > > if ((err = avcodec_receive_frame(frame)) == 0) { > > render_frame(frame); > > } > > } while (err == 0); > > > > I'll usually get EAGAIN immediately for the first few frames I submit > > (so no output frame yet), but then I'll get a batch of output frames > > back after the first completed decode. That drains the excess latency > > from the pipeline to avoid always being behind. > > > > For cases where we want to prioritize latency over throughput, I've > > had success with this approach too: > > > > avcodec_send_packet(&pkt); > > while (avcodec_receive_frame(frame) == AVERROR(EAGAIN)) { > > msleep(1); > > } > > render_frame(frame); > > > > In this case, we can retry avcodec_receive_frame() until we get the > > frame back that we just submitted for decoding. > > > > > The patch here enables both of these use-cases by allowing V4L2M2M > > to retry getting a decoded frame without new input data. Both of > > these also work with MMAL after the recent decoupled dataflow patch. > > > > > Could you share the dataset? > > > > > > > > It is 720p60.h264 from here: > > https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ALoKfcPfFeKyhzs&id=C15BF9770619F56%21165617&cid=0C15BF9770619F56 > > I could not decode this dataset on rpi4 (before or after the patch). Tried to upgrade kernel > to 5.16, but still same problem. Odroid xu4 seems to work fine. This patch fixes decoding on the RPi4 for me: https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20210819085533.1174-2-ming.qian@nxp.com/ It would be nice to get the fix into the upcoming release. -- Andriy _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-02 16:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <20211214021215.456493-1-aicommander@gmail.com> 2021-12-25 7:28 ` Andriy Gelman 2021-12-27 6:17 ` Andriy Gelman 2021-12-27 9:18 ` Cameron Gutman 2021-12-28 23:41 ` Andriy Gelman 2022-01-02 16:56 ` Andriy Gelman [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20220102165641.5fewafbspqf7wo5n@jackie \ --to=andriy.gelman@gmail.com \ --cc=aicommander@gmail.com \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ --cc=jc@kynesim.co.uk \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git