Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andriy Gelman <andriy.gelman@gmail.com>
To: Cameron Gutman <aicommander@gmail.com>, jc@kynesim.co.uk
Cc: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec/v4l2_m2m_dec: dequeue frame if input isn't ready
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2022 11:56:41 -0500
Message-ID: <20220102165641.5fewafbspqf7wo5n@jackie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211228234135.p5rreo3orbo6axsr@jackie>

On Tue, 28. Dec 18:41, Andriy Gelman wrote:
> On Mon, 27. Dec 03:18, Cameron Gutman wrote:
> > On 12/27/21 00:17, Andriy Gelman wrote:
> > > On Tue, 14. Dec 02:12, Cameron Gutman wrote:
> > >> The V4L2M2M API operates asynchronously, so multiple packets can
> > >> be enqueued before getting a batch of frames back. Since it was
> > >> only possible to receive a frame by submitting another packet,
> > >> there wasn't a way to drain those excess output frames from when
> > >> avcodec_receive_frame() returned AVERROR(EAGAIN).
> > >>
> > > 
> > >> In my testing, this change reduced decode latency of a real-time
> > >> 60 FPS H.264 stream by approximately 10x (200ms -> 20ms) on a
> > >> Raspberry Pi 4.
> > > 
> > > I was doing some more tests today, but didn't have any luck dequeuing a frame
> > > if ff_decode_get_packet() returned EAGAIN.
> > 
> > Hmm, maybe there is something different about your test harness?
> > I'm receiving 720p 60 FPS H.264 ES in real-time from the network.
> 
> I used ffmpeg, i.e.
> ./ffmpeg -codec:v h264_v4l2m2m -i 720p60.h264 -f null -
> 
> Anyway, I applied your patch but just removed the comment on latency
> because I couldn't reproduce it.
> 
> > 
> > For each H.264 encoded frame I receive off the network, my basic
> > approach is like this (simplified for brevity):
> > 
> > avcodec_send_packet(&pkt);
> > do {
> >     frame = av_frame_alloc();
> >     if ((err = avcodec_receive_frame(frame)) == 0) {
> >         render_frame(frame);
> >     }
> > } while (err == 0);
> > 
> > I'll usually get EAGAIN immediately for the first few frames I submit
> > (so no output frame yet), but then I'll get a batch of output frames
> > back after the first completed decode. That drains the excess latency
> > from the pipeline to avoid always being behind.
> > 
> > For cases where we want to prioritize latency over throughput, I've
> > had success with this approach too:
> > 
> > avcodec_send_packet(&pkt);
> > while (avcodec_receive_frame(frame) == AVERROR(EAGAIN)) {
> >     msleep(1);
> > }
> > render_frame(frame);
> > 
> > In this case, we can retry avcodec_receive_frame() until we get the
> > frame back that we just submitted for decoding.
> 
> > 
> > The patch here enables both of these use-cases by allowing V4L2M2M
> > to retry getting a decoded frame without new input data. Both of
> > these also work with MMAL after the recent decoupled dataflow patch.
> > 
> > > Could you share the dataset?
> > > 
> > 
> 
> > It is 720p60.h264 from here:
> > https://onedrive.live.com/?authkey=%21ALoKfcPfFeKyhzs&id=C15BF9770619F56%21165617&cid=0C15BF9770619F56

> 
> I could not decode this dataset on rpi4 (before or after the patch). Tried to upgrade kernel
> to 5.16, but still same problem. Odroid xu4 seems to work fine.

This patch fixes decoding on the RPi4 for me:
https://patchwork.ffmpeg.org/project/ffmpeg/patch/20210819085533.1174-2-ming.qian@nxp.com/

It would be nice to get the fix into the upcoming release.

-- 
Andriy
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

      reply	other threads:[~2022-01-02 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20211214021215.456493-1-aicommander@gmail.com>
2021-12-25  7:28 ` Andriy Gelman
2021-12-27  6:17 ` Andriy Gelman
2021-12-27  9:18   ` Cameron Gutman
2021-12-28 23:41     ` Andriy Gelman
2022-01-02 16:56       ` Andriy Gelman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220102165641.5fewafbspqf7wo5n@jackie \
    --to=andriy.gelman@gmail.com \
    --cc=aicommander@gmail.com \
    --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \
    --cc=jc@kynesim.co.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone:

	git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \
		ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com
	public-inbox-index ffmpegdev

Example config snippet for mirrors.


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git