From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3B41D17 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C99068B13C; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:32:25 +0200 (EET) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E361568ABCA for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 16:32:18 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (213-47-68-29.cable.dynamic.surfer.at [213.47.68.29]) (Authenticated sender: michael@niedermayer.cc) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 26495E0006 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2021 14:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2021 15:32:17 +0100 From: Michael Niedermayer To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <20211215143217.GT2829255@pb2> References: <20211214040806.178814-1-ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com> <20211214163026.GO2829255@pb2> <20211214121616.499620bf@fido6> <20211214214010.GQ2829255@pb2> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Haihao Xiang for vaapi X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8560911958384771880==" Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: --===============8560911958384771880== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JLIp2plfdxRvUjgn" Content-Disposition: inline --JLIp2plfdxRvUjgn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:31:40PM +0000, Soft Works wrote: >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Micha= el > > Niedermayer > > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:40 PM > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add Haihao Xiang for v= aapi > >=20 > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 12:16:16PM -0800, Philip Langdale wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 16:39:40 +0000 > > > "Eoff, Ullysses A" wrote: > > > > > > > I have not seen any objections. > > > > I just added Mark to CC using their email found on this ML. > > > > Unfortunately, we don't have current email contact for > > > > Gwenole (whom has not worked on ffmpeg for ~6 years). > > > > Who else can make the approval, aside from the inactive people > > > > previously listed? > > > > > > Are people reluctant to approve? > >=20 > > I dont think so, iam just extra carefull as someone on IRC noticed that > > "everyone and their grandmother who's worked for intel's got push acces= s" > >=20 > > There where also some complaints about code quality/cleanlyness > > toward intels contributions >=20 > That's true. There are differences, and my expressed support is=20 > specifically tied to the person, not about having just "somebody". >=20 > I have my reservations about too early adoption of oneVPL and I think > the patchset "Cleanup QSV Filters.." is doing too many things at once, > but well - being a maintainer still doesn't mean that one could merge > anything without consent. >=20 > But the current situation, like having two or three people working full-t= ime > on the subject being depending on somebody who isn't following progress > and unable assess, evaluate and test proposed changes is quite awkward. yes >=20 > > So i just wanted to make sure there are no objections (iam not concious= ly > > aware of any objections to these MAINTAINER additions ATM) > >=20 > >=20 > > > I'll give it my approval to have on > > > the record. If the old maintainers want to emerge from the woodwork a= nd > > > object after the fact, they are welcome to do so, but we can't just s= it > > > around indefinitely.=20 >=20 > I'm actually wondering, whether registered maintainers that do not=20 > respond anymore to contributions for a certain amount of time, > shouldn't be unregistered automatically at some point? If they never react they should be removed when a new volunteer is added. they should be informed about that when possible though. Also when there is noone else, then listing the last maintainer even if (s)he is mostly inactive still can make sense as it gives at least some poi= nt of contact=20 thx [...] --=20 Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB "You are 36 times more likely to die in a bathtub than at the hands of a terrorist. Also, you are 2.5 times more likely to become a president and 2 times more likely to become an astronaut, than to die in a terrorist attack." -- Thoughty2 --JLIp2plfdxRvUjgn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEIAB0WIQSf8hKLFH72cwut8TNhHseHBAsPqwUCYbn8bQAKCRBhHseHBAsP q1amAKCbJjv3w1tMRTD1ptk2r8NcrvAi/wCeO7ihOrvScW0sWtMohhy2U0CQx94= =8z6l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JLIp2plfdxRvUjgn-- --===============8560911958384771880== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". --===============8560911958384771880==--