From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003C8457E7 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 10:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C468C009; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:10:17 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.176]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E062B68BFF5 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:10:11 +0200 (EET) Received: from laptop.lan (h-79-136-39-105.A258.priv.bahnhof.se [79.136.39.105]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6C12A1FD20 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:10:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1de2f5c89287a5bd7904a73b4d9c0aa424af7406.camel@haerdin.se> From: Tomas =?ISO-8859-1?Q?H=E4rdin?= To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:10:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20230213180936.815-1-nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris> <20230213180936.815-5-nicolas.gaullier@cji.paris> <372327565ea2381ee93a824dfbe72a13c2916518.camel@haerdin.se> User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3-1+deb11u1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 4/6] avformat/wavdec: s337m support X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: tis 2023-02-21 klockan 12:30 +0000 skrev Nicolas Gaullier: > > This is why it is better to demand that these things be explicitly > > signalled. At the same time a lot of users expect ffmpeg to Just > > Work, but that is not always possible. Perhaps we should should put > > this in the manual and tell >spdif/s377m/dolby-e users to RTFM? > > > > > And another point here in this latest edition on my patch serie > > > is > > > that the use of an existing AVOption makes it possible for users > > > to > > > upgrade their command lines just now by adding the option : > > > ignored in previous version, it will take effect the day they > > > upgrade > > > their ffmpeg version, so the transition can be smooth... > > > > Assuming users read the documentation of course.. > > Yes, definitely, at the end, I don't see an option other than RTFM. > Documentation : I could insert a "dolby_e" section between ac3 and > flac in decoders.texi. > But there is nothing specific to dolby_e for real. > Maybe an overall "stream probing" chapter would be better in > decoders.texi between "Decoders" and "Video Decoders" chapters; with > a specific paragraph about the non_pcm_mode option for wav/s337 (and > later for s302) ? Hmm. Perhaps. This also touches demuxers to an extent, so perhaps a section for wavdec with a link to the dolby-e section in the decoder documentation in that case? /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".