Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding

[Gyan Doshi <ffmpeg@gyani.pro>]

On 2024-02-18 01:25 am, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 13:37:38)
>> On 2024-02-17 05:52 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote:
>>> Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-17 12:46:27)
>>>> As a TC member who is part of the disagreement, I believe your
>>>> participation is recused.
>>> No, I do not think "TC members who commented on a patch lose their right
>>> to vote" is a reasonable interpretation of that rule.
>> I refer to
>>
>> "If the disagreement involves a member of the TC, that member should
>> recuse themselves from the decision"
>>
>> at
>>
>> https://ffmpeg.org/community.html#Announcement
>>
>> You clearly are one of the parties to the disagreement, and "recuse
>> themselves from the decision" is self-explanatory.
> Such a maximalist interpretation makes no sense - why should my opinion
> become invalid because I commented on a patch, but not if I kept it to
> myself and let someone else object to your patch?

a) I didn't make that rule, just pointed it out
b) what "maximalist" interpretation? - I think the current patch is 
fine, you don't. That's a disagreement and you're involved in it, so the 
rule tells you to not be a judge. This is not a complex body of law or 
obscure legalese , just a trivial application of the rule composed in 
school-level English.
c) your opinion hasn't been made invalid - it just can't be a weighted 
vote in the TC decision. And it's not merely because you 'commented' - 
see (b).

Regards,
Gyan

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".