From: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/imgutils: av_image_check_size2() ensure width and height fit in 32bit Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 17:14:37 +0200 Message-ID: <172053807774.21847.8430412564103918732@lain.khirnov.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240709132810.GA4991@pb2> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-07-09 15:28:10) > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > ensure width and height fit in 32bit > > > > why? > > because not everyone wants undefined behavior > because not everyone wants security issues > because we dont support width and height > 32bit and its easier to check in a central place > because the changed codes purpose is to check if the image paramaters are > within what we support, and width of 100 billion is not. You can try > all encoders with 100billion width. Then try to decode. > Iam curious, how many work, how many fail and how they fail > how many invalid bitstreams with no warning, how many undefined behaviors, ... > > Simply building FFmpeg on a platform with 64bit ints doesnt update > ISO and ITU standards to allow larger values Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2020-10-07 16:45:56): > At least in code i wrote and write i consider it a bug if it would > assume sizeof(int/unsigned) == 4 Make up your mind. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-09 15:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-07-09 11:36 Michael Niedermayer 2024-07-09 13:17 ` Anton Khirnov 2024-07-09 13:28 ` Michael Niedermayer 2024-07-09 13:37 ` Michael Niedermayer 2024-07-09 15:14 ` Anton Khirnov [this message] 2024-07-09 22:00 ` Michael Niedermayer 2024-07-10 8:23 ` Anton Khirnov 2024-07-10 13:44 ` Michael Niedermayer 2024-07-10 13:51 ` Anton Khirnov 2024-07-14 12:34 ` Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel 2024-07-10 13:55 ` Paul B Mahol 2024-07-15 10:42 ` Vittorio Giovara
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=172053807774.21847.8430412564103918732@lain.khirnov.net \ --to=anton@khirnov.net \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git