From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABDE34ACA0 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 10:09:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A034368D745; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:09:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C976B68D71A for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 13:09:35 +0300 (EEST) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=p12kysdk; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCBD240DAC for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:09:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ed4wjgfhz74z for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1718705374; bh=l4vQUrMTMcADowBiW5QGxkagsuJvMfMihDEkpJHUS2E=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=p12kysdk9X4tb2A3xaoZsH1oGOP6Q8P+sOHBh9ZnpJ/tkiFHqxJfwWGw6W25C8gv8 BhNHiiYsNWymrNF09PqxWgQa0qRPffSu/aeHWzZigTStrkYKZT5gLsaw9XoaRsXSwp VJbGw0iZKkrbJECNCgYexTWHah7jejlqhHgTXwYwYmGy9BtrSelVqgEK/jhkYRDB6h GDmH4mPN68PPzmm6Yr8Hg6HkZGlFJuKJv+k9ESfMvAIm4yojTFfkM28C/ydO7U25Uw RUdoS/Cz3Hnffskrl/XbBKKS++c5OPMD6snjtKeivxlMh9PP3S1EUKNarU8E74yWtb yITFcg7KglvAw== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9462404E5 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1C5691601B9; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:09:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20240617234825.GE4991@pb2> References: <20240616230831.912377-1-michael@niedermayer.cc> <20240616230831.912377-7-michael@niedermayer.cc> <171860804339.28895.10807353542433656746@lain.khirnov.net> <20240617234825.GE4991@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 12:09:34 +0200 Message-ID: <171870537407.28895.5960894387853799090@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 7/9] MAINTAINERS: Update the entries for the release maintainer for FFmpeg X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-06-18 01:48:25) > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 09:07:23AM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-06-17 01:08:29) > > > Ive been told that someone at the BCN video tech meetup claimed to be the > > > "release maintainer for FFmpeg". > > > > > > If you have any doubt who maintains releases, just do something like the following and look at the output: > > > VER=5.1 > > > echo commiters ; git shortlog --group=committer -s n$VER..release/$VER -n ;\ > > > echo authors ; git shortlog -s n$VER..release/$VER -n > > > > Passive aggressive gossip does not belong in a commit message. > > we generally explain in a commit message the "why" and "what" and so on. > There was no intention of any aggression. The commit message is indirectly accusing an unindentified person of trying to usurp your position as a release maintainer. The accusation is aggressive, and the fact that it is indirect makes it passive aggressive. Not providing any specifics beyond "someone said that someone said" makes it gossip. Each of those factors in isolation IMO makes this text inappropriate for a commit message. > But how would you word it instead ? I would not word it at all, as there is no evidence that this needs clarifying. Gossip is not evidence. > The example git commands simply show the authors and commiters on the release branch > since the first release on it. I think its reasonable to provide these as reference I don't. Nobody is disputing your role as a release maintainer. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".