From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027F549B72 for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 21:58:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C2968D3D6; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 23:57:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8EF68D2AC for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 23:57:51 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=aH23uQx9; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 473A724048D for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:57:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id GqjwnkRlFAwD for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:57:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1709503069; bh=lujT9Pd3NEohdu/wpGmdLmvQxZlMzyRwYzrbjGNdzZE=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=aH23uQx9v0yAtPzWyebBzjYIvPHJh4lnOy1qG/7Pfiz+rnihhuHh6D/g6HRqEDC6A 7ZNIEodECs1MflBF1Yqv0u8XOs2BVQ0neLZ3Dm2aEazNP3u6E3/OjLI/PiECr+oIP5 tklPMBdBZqvz4jNo06rF4EZmCzt7gZgTuH/1XNZKmtmzZ4fs9T4kfXkNSk0Wg3O3RB K5C00W9bSGqV14saHPK9rj/FGZJoOMchO+zGmtQnW/EbyLPU4yVpTVwrFgOscGnLk9 95fm2ZEtbw1ZfQNCRa91//iBZOVeFTdQlyX0rQH9WHpzQaTkE0f4wWBkoRiM0SpP57 liXUaxj3dEyEg== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D06240177 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:57:49 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 593411601B9; Sun, 3 Mar 2024 22:57:43 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> In-Reply-To: <20240303024933.GO6420@pb2> References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170931439255.29002.12138406678517187858@lain.khirnov.net> <20240303024933.GO6420@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2024 22:57:43 +0100 Message-ID: <170950306333.29002.5687162281042860048@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>, <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel> List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>, <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe> Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org> Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/170950306333.29002.5687162281042860048@lain.khirnov.net/> List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/> List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-03-03 03:49:33) > Hi > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 06:33:12PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Hi all, > > it seems the discussion died down, > > There are patches pending, which i will apply soon if no objections > have been raised. I object to these patches. This way of hijacking discussion is just rude. > And noone owns law texts. These patches are not law texts, they are documentation. Authorship and copyright apply to them, same as to code. > Everyone can propose any derivation > of anothers suggestion. Thats the idea behind evolution and improvment > and the idea behind finding and dicussing variations. But the problem is not about ownership, but rather about telling people "stop discussing here and instead go to some other thread and comment on those other patches". There seems to be a wide consensus that we have a fundamental disagreement here and the best way to resolve it is through a vote. It also seems to me that you keep trying to derail the vote, for unclear reasons. > Please add the vote options: (I belive this gives the people a more > complete set of choices) Why do you feel you need to bestow all these options upon "the people"? If "the people" wanted these options, they would have asked for them. Again, it seems like you are trying to derail the vote. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".