From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA76149A91 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 07:20:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AF668CAA4; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:20:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C864C68BF87 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 09:20:31 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=lA7QFd3H; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5C72401C1 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:20:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBZODjLQh_QP for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:20:30 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1709018430; bh=d641mGoYoav+k86b0upSXNderw20cUMdN7R5P9Zy3eo=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lA7QFd3HiG+PAPB1Ah/2KlGIzGe0GjqmxmQKALqATj5hqhIxI2uXJIF3b1dfYkVqY 0aO0nBqxYqWeIUUgK0X5IKqdPnN4lSEkyZSusrfPedS/1sflei4pADBVTPJaWnvHT4 ZlUzy5yAkdYyF9td5D+KRDTUxXdrtRBbyxVx5RlpC195vMdSHLmL8LWGpu6WVBQyyY nOh6kwJgdTr3zCw01uaEqGCu208LAfGExz4Dvh72/3GsrxHS9+KDOjmeIe+ef1xXdo vmvTDiLfH2jmJrA4wzUd1AuTM22dbJun3pOsx+oB5peVAZATi21hH/RS0NbAJN9BbW CWxn5EDo3Ykng== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82771240177 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:20:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6242B1601B9; Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:20:30 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20240226224720.GW6420@pb2> References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> <20240220215033.GB93170@haasn.xyz> <170863646063.27417.10776746571038243119@lain.khirnov.net> <20240223232708.GJ6420@pb2> <170896637695.29002.14771451562422231612@lain.khirnov.net> <20240226224720.GW6420@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 08:20:30 +0100 Message-ID: <170901843037.29002.2331338975539682545@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-26 23:47:20) > > Look at the 3 patches i just posted. > I suspect we can move alot closer to what you suggest without a vote but > simply by consensus Your patches use a 'must' wording, while multiple people would prefer a 'should'. But even more importantly, you are leaving the disputed line as is, so it's not solving the problem at all. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".