From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA6F49A42 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 19:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A997B68C865; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:17:24 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A858D68BE9D for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 21:17:17 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=CCG9QH51; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B4A2401C1 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:17:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id vjIEdqg7uDtM for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:17:16 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1708975036; bh=ugbXobxGdKRw8O3ZGtWHQMN2O6H1viLiTFKSSygWCUE=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=CCG9QH51w0HjeLceYIPPwvcsKNWLhWO5+iJ6Ipq0MyU3GmfMp5t+k4TwFtKqcn8om KSpOj2O7sUEKsG6L/BLP1h+bbUphZkR0NaC0dYc+RmsiMHEPCk/kDmX1oGfALrioUZ 6w3BxVsmrsKr1auW1KdKcLVtluknvZK8EeeYdkyU4VeRGqTdRh6oX4rr8d3m1WgIy9 dmoNi6uU8H9Ua9Lj6OeTLUuF7nAuztJBqKMuPKgpWxS3aWYpFi9IhrT1Ipwvt3GaNk 8Hnqc3Ck6/zf8kasCd6EyLskB4k3fedzmYMhLgUmgBu4/4DGyIuce9Zs2chyh8L+oP XrstuiYMMyKww== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85113240177 for ; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:17:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6569E1601B9; Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:17:16 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> <903b92fd-f1b5-42ee-81f4-04136b3b526f@gyani.pro> <170842737298.27417.5283452340136231344@lain.khirnov.net> <99bb2fa4-9dc1-4ceb-b2c3-c68c4ea2bd6e@gyani.pro> <170863690440.27417.14779852198662228522@lain.khirnov.net> <170896522566.29002.77198056373054248@lain.khirnov.net> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 20:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: <170897503638.29023.6399225195806730997@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Ronald S. Bultje (2024-02-26 19:12:45) > That's essentially what I was suggesting: run a GA vote on your proposed > amendment, and then run a separate GA vote on Nicolas' proposed amendment. They don't seem orthogonal to me though, they both replace the same disputed line and seem pretty much mutually exclusive. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".