From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726E348C5F for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 21:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5284968C094; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:14:28 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C5268BD2C for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:14:22 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=naQ7oGoq; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F342401C1 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:14:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1qlCuwZ51UUj for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:14:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1708636460; bh=f1/eOdcAJG8RT2SwY+wJFKEYCzdJnouKYSvywON4bPk=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=naQ7oGoquQRcudLNJ8A/UEq0uiKVVMuozxk5O/iGi00NuF1yWg5e+yzjmj8Y/0ZCZ zAscEALAmcQMSMlmVY+zHGEbVkKv/a3VCZjf+aG64DHjSczdBnMZQh87F5/Lji5KhL FKwjRJkECFcZx56447oKdTIb/RV85OJhQHzoJD6023MNa8u1KLOSqPnfmtwSfTXIwY Y5mQMoDEcanS8oXVqG01Pv2wjle999dm1PO5k+LLoYef6e/XbTQMdakcqWZMQMdxoB mpAtKmirj1/UjeIFyRysIKrjzYmEqtYQP09bQzhqLRg0tTqxVt/N7qGCfFXvCp0i1k 9VkodfzRoxrYw== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A9E240177 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:14:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A2B701601B9; Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:14:20 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20240220215033.GB93170@haasn.xyz> References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <170841903359.27417.409422117260058401@lain.khirnov.net> <20240220215033.GB93170@haasn.xyz> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:14:20 +0100 Message-ID: <170863646063.27417.10776746571038243119@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Niklas Haas (2024-02-20 21:50:33) > On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:50:33 +0100 Anton Khirnov wrote: > > + Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their > > + view, best for the project. If a TC member is affected by a conflict of > > + interest with regards to the case, they must announce it and recuse > > + themselves from the TC discussion and vote. A conflict of interest is > > + presumed to occur when a TC member has a personal interest (e.g. > > + financial) in a specific outcome of the case. > > My preferred wording would change "If a TC member is" to "If a TC member > feels they are" and "must" to "should". > > I read it as a common sense recommendation, not a legalese text. It is > ultimately up to the individual to judge whether they are acting in good > faith or not. Okay, that makes sense to me. I am then changing my proposal to: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Each TC member must vote on such decision according to what is, in their view, best for the project. If a TC member feels they are affected by a conflict of interest with regards to the case, they should announce it and recuse themselves from the TC discussion and vote. A conflict of interest is presumed to occur when a TC member has a personal interest (e.g. financial) in a specific outcome of the case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If someone wants a "stronger" version of this among the voting options, feel welcome to propose one. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".