From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52784987F for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 16:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC71F68D1C1; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:10:20 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D5A68CDE9 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:10:14 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=sav5swEm; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4F8240DA9 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:10:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id YiF4BXqAjy5d for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:10:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1708445411; bh=1nB6ukqUYrpH1bPsvuCwMGXbaFC+rPh+JVbjsO8QX5o=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=sav5swEm6Ip85TZrQO/4fq4JxMP/1eDoBa8S7RXsdc95ButmFbBg7ojMHciyf847m vOqMN6+OESSRnygJzjodziS9y7ofi00G1pR3rE2FUq0kT5l8w+II19S74p1lvsH91c gHNnS1Wgs8wJHU0uDjFsP+/WxXqiojVvdsa0Yu/VT8xzKn2zR6/ZQZ3YoF93O694fP o4Cc80cw+jNKtFt4g3xLdzuVBHjUIz1AdHljLoNkOQrBsVzEaVh3ovH07NzoxUTk59 0mn9q/E9tpoXj9M9SESb4vOYqN1F4/CSWeY2G1Zj8RCja89D3Kprr1vcSLq1KNBo7u vR8G4OpnRWAVw== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FF11240177 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:10:11 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BCB51601B9; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:10:11 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20240220140111.GS6420@pb2> References: <170841737762.27417.14992162535824834057@lain.khirnov.net> <20240220140111.GS6420@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:10:11 +0100 Message-ID: <170844541128.27417.16221102082226061746@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] clarifying the TC conflict of interest rule X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-02-20 15:01:11) > On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 09:22:57AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > [...] > > their preferred wording, and then we can have the GA vote on it. > > Before this GA vote, we need another extra member discussion/vote. > Because the last GA reset droped several developers from the GA I see neither why would we "need" such a vote, or why should it be related to this one. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".