From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044B2476D8 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 18:03:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1735568D366; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:03:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B2B068D211 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 20:03:46 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=UULln2yR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8552240DA9 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:03:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0jkYHPO8YSnP for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:03:45 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1708279425; bh=6jd2KYZPlT9EigEAbpdiChtVbD0dTZKI6mx7QHJfDhk=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UULln2yRK+FWtqP1lsMpY59AsTqzYCOHt+Ota6NdpUt6fC36PUe+idsr5Qrn3OhQU 21+Id5D5UDvF/iS6eT8ywXksvxC1XoYd2nMcLly50BWRQvLiKHtxhW+q4xQOjg6dp8 OdOXcbfnRVAMruunjPQgXPNp46mxqq7SyGJ/MqJFwl2M3ezGnnrfiXKwbQLoVAYJ9G KBtXSo5+Y3W7Aiq5LObzG33b8IWJJlgYN4WQR5e7G7+FzSoeUfbvigqyA4y/uKaEWz gtJ5rjcekB9vsOFwpO7Fgg5y40ys33vTHMXXacsP8/nzJSK8+Xd4F85BhlUAV0/d1Q X7gHhwRMGVotw== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33781240177 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:03:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E5631601B9; Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:03:45 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <1cfaf923-387f-450b-bf63-71914e930e71@gyani.pro> References: <20240123064948.455-1-ffmpeg@gyani.pro> <36aab7a2-3590-4cc1-aeb4-8805d6484de9@gyani.pro> <677047fe-11e4-4a62-a003-912471ff81ef@gyani.pro> <170643927262.8914.6288212134706680203@lain.khirnov.net> <594a2da4-0693-483e-82ab-2924b16d8dbb@gyani.pro> <170799405543.32390.14003661310804711658@lain.khirnov.net> <0c3c8b9b-927e-470d-9272-67536279ba15@gyani.pro> <170801340414.21676.5189683358387742257@lain.khirnov.net> <170807419472.21676.17214572018161936192@lain.khirnov.net> <6a46373c-3a6b-4490-9ae9-46d2a72a3e5a@gyani.pro> <170817255879.21676.17805665941049439864@lain.khirnov.net> <170819974399.21676.13449065399578350362@lain.khirnov.net> <1cfaf923-387f-450b-bf63-71914e930e71@gyani.pro> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 19:03:45 +0100 Message-ID: <170827942509.21676.17284387425555624715@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Gyan Doshi (2024-02-18 05:06:30) > b) what "maximalist" interpretation? A non-maximalist interpretation would be that a TC member is only excluded from voting when they authored the patch that is being disputed. > - I think the current patch is fine, you don't. That's a disagreement > and you're involved in it, so the rule tells you to not be a judge. Anything handled by the TC is a disagreement. Then according to your interpretation, any TC member who expressed an opinion on a patch (either positive or negative) becomes a party to the disagreement and cannot vote. That is absurd and makes no sense. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".