From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7A24965B for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE0368D115; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:47:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 814CE68CD82 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:47:38 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=gJ5Cdk62; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EC1240DA9; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:47:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id eMApqtHZUaL7; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:47:37 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1707994057; bh=4KbcYjl+fvJJO7nrqvWVMTM7Y7nhcT++WqZdy7LJEFQ=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=gJ5Cdk62MYTV3+VBkMNc31hmXrjx2FidI/liKXmhviXZHSrRlGyREPRWlIpWuTKTm 7qZ9iRU/UX1rZdCsj+4559oLA2VagYyJRoAWWb5hHfTgXDLeNLmjbXSZGshDthpdqM ZMW86B+TNjNSFZCXuJ0/uPdzUUa7fY2ORwBLnh6joBE669PULyFB5KoKgQBA2NfoLl VHWIivkDMjySwRo/kh1WlmPrbPvrIMdp1sNx8G7GT6qTj0W4HkrIuTg7Zr++ccuUwm AKm8bs/Gk4gXB67D6PrJME4q01qRIc+prxhtmZFSVKhmtJIq/n3B4nPudtl4h+wzRx Ywlnv3iqsm2gQ== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EED240177; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:47:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 706801601B9; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:47:35 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <594a2da4-0693-483e-82ab-2924b16d8dbb@gyani.pro> References: <20240123064948.455-1-ffmpeg@gyani.pro> <36aab7a2-3590-4cc1-aeb4-8805d6484de9@gyani.pro> <677047fe-11e4-4a62-a003-912471ff81ef@gyani.pro> <170643927262.8914.6288212134706680203@lain.khirnov.net> <594a2da4-0693-483e-82ab-2924b16d8dbb@gyani.pro> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches , Gyan Doshi Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:47:35 +0100 Message-ID: <170799405543.32390.14003661310804711658@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avcodec/s302m: enable non-PCM decoding X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Gyan Doshi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi, sorry for the delay, I've been busy fixing things for the release Quoting Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel (2024-01-29 05:00:33) > On 2024-01-28 04:24 pm, Anton Khirnov wrote: > >> a) it would mean essentially inlining this decoder in the demuxer. > > Why is that a problem? This decoder seems like it shouldn't be a > > decoder. > > > > I agree with Andreas that this seems like it's a demuxer pretending to > > be a decoder. > > This module transforms the entire raw payload data to generate its > output, even if the syntax is simple which > essentially makes it a de-coder. The de-multiplexer aspect of multiple > streams is an academic possibility allowed > by the standard but not seen in any sample which makes me suspect it's > used for carriage between broadcast > facilities rather than something ever sent to an OTT provider, let alone > an end user. If it dynamically generates nested decoders, then it's not a proper codec in our model. It should be either a part of the demuxer, or a bitstream filter (possibly inserted automatically by the demuxer). -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".