From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BBB48D8A for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B04468D15D; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:22:32 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05AF868CE0C for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:22:26 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=dGMRBvLC; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E452405F2 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id dPq_29PLc6WV for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1706286145; bh=lBP9fAw8N+3Ef1QFsN0sMI6EUGvsZ9gB0nmKICBFI7g=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dGMRBvLCJgCarrt1MrUACVkTK+AqjsdxdLTvlvHdW5RR/Ul9iH8FTvYNXGRbuj1zl ByTBn7BC0GYCDAVkb8M6PiNz+0HsuH6l534gLowKTcgSjWsJq2VktNxNWUlEIxysVr MyaK12zZHD0CTbnuB/U2EFQI4jhyTPu/DAMvP3qaBap6xOMQdE34oWT/m4MVC+AmZ9 CJWs4dJ6Lbz2zWBEm0ZqxsidjeuRu+Sr1zRTwpBKtiNTQYsnn+uUgqetByGZ//gq2d s85/Bi+oocfB8R1urvtvEnnwdVnkIoOMXQzNH7qBfB807wsMNZ0XSxJi1qc8spkDMu a3U8PCYu0Z4oQ== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 296F72404E5 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 169561601B9; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:25 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: References: <20240126103905.17826-1-anton@khirnov.net> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:22:25 +0100 Message-ID: <170628614505.8914.14676462227056788946@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: move bitstream filters into bsf/ subdir X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Andreas Rheinhardt (2024-01-26 13:35:56) > > This is inconsistent with the behaviour for arch-specific subfolders. Does it need to be consistent? Bitstream filters typically share more headers with decoders and parsers than arch-specific code. > It also interferes with the files not in the bsf-subfolder (like > h264_levels.o). Interferes how? -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".