From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7916848D8A for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 16:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23DF568D146; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:17:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E145968CF79 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 18:17:38 +0200 (EET) Authentication-Results: mail0.khirnov.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=khirnov.net header.i=@khirnov.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=D4Ed3WxN; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05A52405F2 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:17:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id qdrc3v0wkt_j for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:17:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=khirnov.net; s=mail; t=1706285858; bh=86jPS9gNS9LgAhPSuEq51fsbBlpSJXMB4CmoTZ7zALI=; h=Subject:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=D4Ed3WxNCQS13x0qFPy1k4Ww7Le+gy1ynX9jYEsrVPdw8DLLU1IMbNNRElkcdwHVk bxj7uMBaC+mfFe6RIbyeFzM3ikxztIBPMIWDC8KAk7N8NYD5dCcSJZMgsLUmOidspK tzYhJTKICqQq1UxAC4hV5P++5ODbUFZt1Gx8j2d7xHCAP+zVWmn9Q1/hkOpo2QRgOV ZtrgmpC6fpFcg8/mkLvk9AzJm/aMfaw4uf+QXdBEyW1rsni83HdSIiOAihQx7vOBiY 93GzoRWSZPS8mglbTJoh7tHqDCGdj9Yxikl2L3QTnmnfoLAS/i0HcInJv0w7MuNo8Z XPNgxvuQ/6SEw== Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BC12404E5 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:17:38 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DFC751601B9; Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:17:37 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <4f590e59-2a4b-4415-afb6-b1d54b4d5215@gmail.com> References: <20240126103905.17826-1-anton@khirnov.net> <170627145523.8914.14993136855646933607@lain.khirnov.net> <4f590e59-2a4b-4415-afb6-b1d54b4d5215@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2024 17:17:37 +0100 Message-ID: <170628585789.8914.11774088021293158816@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc: move bitstream filters into bsf/ subdir X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting James Almer (2024-01-26 17:09:32) > On 1/26/2024 9:17 AM, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Lynne (2024-01-26 13:11:33) > >> Jan 26, 2024, 11:40 by anton@khirnov.net: > >> > >>> --- > >>> libavcodec/Makefile | 49 +--------------- > >>> libavcodec/bsf/Makefile | 56 +++++++++++++++++++ > >>> > >> > >> Is that the general direction we want to take? > >> I don't mind it, but I'm wondering if I should do this for what I care about? > > > > I'd say yes for things with >~ 10 files. libavcodec/ got way too large. > > Is your idea something like.. > > libavcodec/bsf > libavcodec/common > libavcodec/decoder > libavcodec/encoder > libavcodec/parser > > And then subfolders within those for big modules like h264, hevc, vvc, > mpeg2, vp9, etc? No, that strikes me as overkill. A subdir for bsfs, a subdir for every codec/group of codecs/subsystem. > And like Andreas mentioned, the arch subfolders need to be considered > for this. Why? -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".