From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C0647A10 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 13:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29BE68AB1D; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:23:21 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F18668CCC5 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 15:23:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FCF2405ED for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:23:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id ivrWGIUyy4KM for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:23:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E439D24043D for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:23:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CF22F1601B9; Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:23:13 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org In-Reply-To: <170116129299.8914.7788150105908081735@lain.khirnov.net> References: <169917852563.11195.3233039152331028161@lain.khirnov.net> <170116129299.8914.7788150105908081735@lain.khirnov.net> Mail-Followup-To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2023 14:23:13 +0100 Message-ID: <170117779381.8914.2683322584082928565@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: TC/CC elections X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: For the record, I've edited the vote description to make it more clear. It now looks like this: Five people from the list below will become the members of the Technical Committee (TC). Assign weights to each person according to how much you want them to be in the committee (higher weight = higher preference). The system will assume you want to maximise the sum of weights of selected candidates. E.g. if X is given a weight of 10 and Y and Z have weights 8 and 6 respectively, then the voting algorithm will assume you prefer a committee with both Y and Z over one with X, because 14 > 10. However, giving Y and Z weight of 4 and 2 instead would have expressed that X is preferred to a combination of Y and Z, because 6 < 10. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".