From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267BB4814E for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 07:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8D468CC5F; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 09:58:37 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06EE868CA29 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 09:58:30 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1892404B1 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id puEzSAD7eBz1 for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F0124043D for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C95EA1601B9; Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:21 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <2e3245e3-e71d-4f17-9c5b-ba2087d30049@mail.de> References: <2e3245e3-e71d-4f17-9c5b-ba2087d30049@mail.de> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:58:21 +0100 Message-ID: <169968950180.11195.280265863451995150@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Repeat vote: GA voters list updates X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Thilo Borgmann via ffmpeg-devel (2023-11-11 08:22:19) > Hi, > > in [1] JB listed his list of authorized voters for the "GA voters list updates" > vote. > > This list does not correlate with the list Josh provided in [2]. The word 'correlate' does not mean what you seem to think it means. The list does correlate. > Neither does this list of 51 people [1] correlate to the 54 authorized voters > (distinct email addresses) the CIVS system actually counted, see [3]. > > This can mean only one of two things, either some people on the list in [1] did > receive more than one ballot, or JB failed to list all the authorized voters and > ballots have been given to unknown people. Both possibilities are unacceptable > flaws for a democratic vote. > > As the admin responsible of the votes it is my duty to have supervision of all > polls and thus it is my duty to declare this vote null and void for the flaws > given above. I am not aware of anyone having given you the right to do this. > michael@niedermayer.cc > onemda@gmail.com > jamrial@gmail.com > andreas.rheinhardt@gmail.com > sw@jkqxz.net > cus@passwd.hu > ceffmpeg@gmail.com > barryjzhao@tencent.com > liuqi05@kuaishou.com > lance.lmwang@gmail.com > martin.vignali@gmail.com > ffmpeg@gyani.pro > aman@tmm1.net > martin@martin.st > diego@biurrun.de > lizhong1008@gmail.com > dev@lynne.ee > nfxjfg@googlemail.com > anton@khirnov.net > atomnuker@gmail.com > timo@rothenpieler.org > u@pkh.me > george@nsup.org > yejun.guo@intel.com > linjie.fu@intel.com > kaustubh.raste@imgtec.com > stebbins@jetheaddev.com > philipl@overt.org > andriy.gelman@gmail.com > vittorio.giovara@gmail.com > jerome.borsboom@carpalis.nl > derek.buitenhuis@gmail.com > pross@xvid.org > jdek@itanimul.li > kjeyapal@akamai.com > dalecurtis@chromium.org > jeebjp@gmail.com > t.rapp@noa-archive.com > vdixit@akamai.com > zhilizhao@tencent.com > matthieu.bouron@gmail.com > yinshiyou-hf@loongson.cn > zane@zanevaniperen.com > ruiling.song@intel.com > kjeyapal@akamai.com > hwrenx@126.com > modmaker@google.com > cand@gmx.com > foobaz86@gmail.com > baptiste.coudurier@gmail.com This list contains at least two duplicates, easily found by inspection. This gives me zero confidence that any hypothetical new vote would be any more reliable than the old one. Also as I said before, option A won its contests against options B/C/D by 17/7, 23/1, and 17/7, respectively. You would thus need to change 10 votes to have any chance of a different result. As the number of disputed voters is nowhere near 10, there is no point in repeating anything. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".