From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC7047DCA for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 09:09:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E02468CC24; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:09:53 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1D468C5BA for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 12:09:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E891240498 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:09:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id flsXexUOOAIc for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5236F2400FF for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:09:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 379051601B9; Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:09:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20231025193010.GF3543730@pb2> References: <169818211998.11195.16532637803201641594@lain.khirnov.net> <20231025193010.GF3543730@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2023 11:09:44 +0200 Message-ID: <169839778420.11195.1155639225990797100@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming GA vote X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2023-10-25 21:30:10) > Hi Anton > > first let me say, this looks much better setup than the previous attempt by jb > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:15:19PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Hi all, > > as discussed at the dev meeting at VDD, we need to have a series of > > votes, the first of which concerns defining when is the GA voter list to > > be updated. > > > > As the previous attempt to vote on this was hampered by email delivery > > issues, and also criticized due to inadequate advance announcement, the > > vote was closed and we are going to try again. > > > > This time, to avoid any confusion, let me clearly state that this is a > > declaration of intent to initiate a GA vote next Monday (2023-10-30), > > unless there are substantial objections. > > > > The vote question will be: > > How do we update the list of active members of the general assembly? > > > > Proposed possibilities so far are: > > * twice a year (1st Jan & 1st July) > > (suggested at VDD) > > * before each vote > > (suggested at VDD) > > * never (keep the 2020 version) > > (suggested at VDD) > > * keep everyone who had vote rights but add active developers each jan/july > > (suggested by Michael on the ML) > > > > Feel welcome to propose additional possibilities until Friday > > 2023-10-27. > > > > Other constructive comments also welcome. > > First i suggest s#jan/july#1st Jan & 1st July# > > Second i suggest to pick a time too, like 0:00 UTC Both of these sound reasonable to me, I'll reword first and last possibility to state it's 1st of that month 0:00 UTC. > Third, for future votes i suggest to lengthen the period of > proposing of additional possibilities. Here we all maybe have seen this already > but. If this was new than 2-3 days really is too short. That period needs > to include discussion and thinking for a person who might be working 8 hour > a day on something unrelated to FFmpeg. I agree in general that it would be good to have at least two weeks, but in this case this has been proposed and discussed a month ago already. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".