From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBDE45BE1 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 19:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4578568BE61; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:42:01 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D8868BB41 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 22:41:54 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E0A2404EE for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id raQZBto32nv1 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C20562404EC for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3A7D1601B2; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: References: <168233503763.3843.15441944598302423310@lain.khirnov.net> <168233747463.3843.6914979374280115185@lain.khirnov.net> <168233804222.3843.2176038618353077915@lain.khirnov.net> <168233943029.9711.17568532350489119659@lain.khirnov.net> <168236385755.3843.9294759004440412931@lain.khirnov.net> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:41:53 +0200 Message-ID: <168236531363.3843.8816694027740371849@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 23/25] fftools/ffmpeg_filter: add filtergraph private data X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Nicolas George (2023-04-24 21:24:20) > Anton Khirnov (12023-04-24): > > I have no idea what you mean by this. > > Try a little harder. No actual explanation then. So I suppose what you mean is that different rules apply to you and everyone else. > > The only fact here is that the quoted paragraph is YOUR PERSONAL > > OPINION, which ZERO other developers expressed support for. > > Or maybe I am the only one not fed up of arguing with walls. There is zero evidence of any active developer agreeing with you on this. Feel welcome to prove me wrong. > Will you dispute that each split of a structure is extra code in many > places? I will, the overhead code required is trivial compared to the code being wrapped. > Will you discuss that having to remember which structure a field belongs > to is an extra effort? I will, not having to consider whether a field is accessed from other parts of the code significantly reduces the mental load required. That is the whole point of information hiding. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".