From: Anton Khirnov <anton@khirnov.net> To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2] fftools/ffmpeg_mux: fix reporting muxer EOF as error Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 14:01:15 +0200 Message-ID: <168225127500.3843.6466868436482522174@lain.khirnov.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <3587873f-7b50-a98c-70ce-443aeb93b9ae@passwd.hu> Quoting Marton Balint (2023-04-23 12:05:51) > > > On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > Quoting Marton Balint (2023-04-23 11:42:48) > >> On Sun, 23 Apr 2023, Anton Khirnov wrote: > >>> Quoting Marton Balint (2023-04-23 11:12:38) > >>>> This seems like yet another clash of AVERROR_EOF error codes coming from > >>>> different places with different semantics. For > >>>> av_interleaved_write_frame(), AVERROR_EOF is an error condition, so > >>>> file encoding should fail, > >>> > >>> Why should it fail? I'd think a muxer returning EOF is the way to signal > >>> non-error muxer-side termination. > >> > >> That would be an API change. AVERROR_EOF is not special in any way from > >> other error codes for av_interleaved_write_frame. A muxer cannot signal > >> non-error muxer side termination with existing API. > > > > All error codes (should) have a specific meaning. I cannot think of a > > good reason for a muxer to return AVERROR_EOF to signal an error. > > Can you? > > Previously, we expeced users to treat any negative error code as error for > av_interleaved_write_frame(). I don't think we expect the users to do anything in particular in responce to av_interleaved_write_frame() return codes. The doxy says that it returns a negative error code on error, but the caller can freely decide what to do with that information - this includes ignoring it. > This is what is documented. ffmpeg.c followed this approach. Don't you > see the slightest problem if we suddenly change this? Seems to me you're mixing ffmpeg CLI and lavf behavior. My claim is entirely from the point of view of the CLI, and is this: if the muxer returns AVERROR_EOF, then it should be treated as normal termination. This is similar to how other components behave - e.g. a (bitstream) filter can at any time decide to return EOF to its downstream, terminating a stream even though more input is available. You could argue that muxers should never return AVERROR_EOF and any muxer that currently does so is buggy, but that is still compatible with the above. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-23 12:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2023-04-22 12:56 Zhao Zhili 2023-04-22 15:44 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-23 9:12 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-23 9:34 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-23 9:42 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-23 9:48 ` "zhilizhao(赵志立)" 2023-04-23 9:51 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-23 10:05 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-23 10:07 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-23 12:01 ` Anton Khirnov [this message] 2023-04-23 18:15 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-23 20:16 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-24 9:09 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-24 9:19 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-24 10:02 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-24 18:41 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-24 19:24 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-24 19:42 ` Marton Balint 2023-04-24 21:08 ` Anton Khirnov 2023-04-25 14:37 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-24 20:41 ` Nicolas George 2023-04-24 10:08 ` Anton Khirnov
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=168225127500.3843.6466868436482522174@lain.khirnov.net \ --to=anton@khirnov.net \ --cc=ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Git Inbox Mirror of the ffmpeg-devel mailing list - see https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel This inbox may be cloned and mirrored by anyone: git clone --mirror https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/0 ffmpegdev/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 ffmpegdev ffmpegdev/ https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev \ ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com public-inbox-index ffmpegdev Example config snippet for mirrors. AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git