From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24AE4532D for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C7468BE01; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:45:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061A568B274 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 17:45:46 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271C32404EC for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:45:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lXJ71qPZJfEi for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:45:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA8FF240178 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:45:44 +0100 (CET) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 91B411601B2; Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:45:42 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> References: <20230116133840.512-1-jamrial@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 16:45:42 +0100 Message-ID: <167457514256.4503.7425182589774123747@lain.khirnov.net> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 00/26] Major library version bump X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: So to summarize the discussion so far: * nobody is strongly arguing for an instability period after the bump, and there are good reasons against it, therefore we should NOT have one * the bump can be done either as bump-then-remove or remove-then-bump * there are advantages and disadvantages for both of those, nobody expressed a strong preference for either, so you can keep this as is Please correct me if I misunderstood or missed something, or somebody has a new opinion. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".