From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0D8428FC for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D6D68B658; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:55:33 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net (red.khirnov.net [176.97.15.12]) by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87C3C68B3C7 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 10:55:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40230240175 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail0.khirnov.net ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mail0.khirnov.net [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VRHr77gqH-RM for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lain.khirnov.net (lain.khirnov.net [IPv6:2001:67c:1138:4306::3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "lain.khirnov.net", Issuer "smtp.khirnov.net SMTP CA" (verified OK)) by mail0.khirnov.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D62622400F5 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:55:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lain.khirnov.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7D9511601B2; Mon, 6 Jun 2022 09:55:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Anton Khirnov To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches In-Reply-To: <20220601170127.GQ396728@pb2> References: <20220530190911.20843-1-michael@niedermayer.cc> <165407988551.13099.15764009399381966957@lain> <20220601170127.GQ396728@pb2> Mail-Followup-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2022 09:55:21 +0200 Message-ID: <165450212145.13099.13616353651253482742@lain> User-Agent: alot/0.8.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] avutil/opt: Alpha workaround X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-06-01 19:01:27) > On Wed, Jun 01, 2022 at 12:38:05PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-05-30 21:09:10) > > > alpha-linux-gnu-gcc-5 (Ubuntu 5.5.0-12ubuntu1) 5.5.0 20171010 with qemu-alpha version 2.11.1(Debian 1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.39) > > > trigger a FPE on the DBL_MAX * 90000 operation > > > > > > Iam not 100% sure why, but if i mess with mfp-trap-mode the compiler produces internal compiler errors > > > This issue seems not to affect the fate box with an older compiler > > > > > > Ive also tried the gcc 6, gcc 7, gcc 8 packages with no luck > > > > Do we event want to keep support for alpha? > > I have no opinion here > > > > Does it still have any > > real-world use? > > i do not know > > > > It does not seem productive to spend development time on > > a dead platform. > > Ive had the same thought and actually was a bit angry on myself after i spend > too long to get a gcc + qemu + gdb working together to debug this. Felt like > i could have done something more productive > > I think a question is, is there someone who wants to maintain alpha support > because it seems it needs some support. > If someone does, its no work for me and i certainly dont mind if we keep alpha > on the list of supported architectures. > If not we can just apply this and pretend its still supported until it breaks > again. Though such support would not be with teh toolchain from the ubuntu > i used. The old fate box seems to work a lot better > Or we can just deprecate it and drop on a future bump > dont really have an opinion, but i dont plan to put any significant amount > of time in alpha support Sounds reasonable. I would be in favor of deprecating it unless someone volunteers to maintain it. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".