Am 16.06.22 um 12:40 schrieb Andreas Rheinhardt: > Thilo Borgmann: >> Am 16.06.22 um 12:13 schrieb Andreas Rheinhardt: >>> Thilo Borgmann: >>>> diff --git a/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c b/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c >>>> index a87562c8a3..833ce9e705 100644 >>>> --- a/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c >>>> +++ b/libavcodec/dovi_rpu.c >>>> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ static inline uint64_t get_ue_coef(GetBitContext >>>> *gb, const AVDOVIRpuDataHeader >>>>       case RPU_COEFF_FIXED: >>>>           ipart = get_ue_golomb_long(gb); >>>>           fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, hdr->coef_log2_denom); >>>> -        return (ipart << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32; >>>> +        return ipart * (1 << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32; >>>>         case RPU_COEFF_FLOAT: >>>>           fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, 32); >>>> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static inline int64_t get_se_coef(GetBitContext >>>> *gb, const AVDOVIRpuDataHeader * >>>>       case RPU_COEFF_FIXED: >>>>           ipart = get_se_golomb_long(gb); >>>>           fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, hdr->coef_log2_denom); >>>> -        return (ipart << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32; >>>> +        return ipart * (1 << hdr->coef_log2_denom) + fpart.u32; >>>>         case RPU_COEFF_FLOAT: >>>>           fpart.u32 = get_bits_long(gb, 32); >>> >>> coef_log2_denom can be in the range 13..32. This means that 1 << >>> hdr->coef_log2_denom can be UB (namely if coef_log2_denom is 31 or 32 >>> for ordinary 32 bit ints); this time it is not UB that happens to work >>> as expected, because 1 << 32 will be 0 or 1 (depending upon the system) >>> and not 2^32. In case of get_ue_coef() this actually adds UB to >>> otherwise fine code. >> >> So 1LL it needs to be, not? Am I still missing something? >> > > This version should not add new UB. > I btw don't get why you are changing get_ue_coef() at all: It's fine > as-is; consistency should only trump when the choice is between several > equally good alternatives which is IMO not true here. (The reason that C > makes left shifts of negative values UB is because of non-two's > complement systems, so it is unfortunate for a project like FFmpeg that > requires two's complement that it has to workaround this restriction by > using a * (1 << b).) Just overthinking consistency, I guess. v4 changes get_se_coef() only. Thanks, Thilo