From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Received: from ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100])
	by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4335B46864
	for <ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 19:46:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4424F68CB05;
	Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:45:59 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from mailout05.t-online.de (mailout05.t-online.de [194.25.134.82])
 by ffbox0-bg.mplayerhq.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6612968BE58
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 22:45:53 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from fwd86.aul.t-online.de (fwd86.aul.t-online.de [10.223.144.112])
 by mailout05.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 067E510003
 for <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.178.21] ([91.60.179.66]) by fwd86.t-online.de
 with (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted)
 esmtp id 1qtYxs-1diAan0; Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:45:52 +0200
To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
References: <20231019181840.GN3543730@pb2>
From: Michael Koch <astroelectronic@t-online.de>
Message-ID: <10d3ec40-f044-add9-000c-584e755fd97e@t-online.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 21:45:51 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20231019181840.GN3543730@pb2>
X-TOI-EXPURGATEID: 150726::1697744752-116DAD75-E4E94D7C/0/0 CLEAN NORMAL
X-TOI-MSGID: d429f2c0-296f-4dc9-aaf7-75530c1c65fc
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] trac spam
X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel.ffmpeg.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/options/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel>,
 <mailto:ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org
Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" <ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org>
Archived-At: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/10d3ec40-f044-add9-000c-584e755fd97e@t-online.de/>
List-Archive: <https://master.gitmailbox.com/ffmpegdev/>
List-Post: <mailto:ffmpegdev@gitmailbox.com>

> IIRC each regex give -10 so multiple matches give more.


Let's assume we have a long keyword like "concretevictoria". Nobody uses 
this keyword in a normal text. A false positive is almost impossible.

I could search for "concretevictoria", "concretevictori." and 
"concretevictor.." and get -30 points.
Or possibly it would also work if I search for "concretevictoria" three 
times?
The idea is to give long keywords a higher weight.

I'm not sure if this idea is acceptable, that's why I'd like to ask for 
your opinions before I do it.

Michael
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".