From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org [79.124.17.100]) by master.gitmailbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74B564C23F for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 16:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B17668DB6A; Fri, 23 May 2025 19:24:44 +0300 (EEST) Received: from mail-24431.protonmail.ch (mail-24431.protonmail.ch [109.224.244.31]) by ffbox0-bg.ffmpeg.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B75CA68DA81 for ; Fri, 23 May 2025 19:24:37 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 16:24:33 +0000 To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Message-ID: <0NdPzMfAQkqilJLq5gKzcUfnYFzP7-Om_lA6-2WxeqisSgrEQEbBepYTcWN8qjOLZBpZdilnuytKlNjNV_vzlzGZUJfRhhFELZQgVC0eW6w=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20250523094514.GW29660@pb2> Feedback-ID: 32895411:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 11bb507e1bf97790dc22b8bec24c9cf6877dc288 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] STF RaptorQ X-BeenThere: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: FFmpeg development discussions and patches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Tristan Matthews via ffmpeg-devel Reply-To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches Cc: Tristan Matthews , Kieran Kunhya Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ffmpeg-devel-bounces@ffmpeg.org Sender: "ffmpeg-devel" Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Post: Hi, > > > But Lynne is insisting it's not a protocol. The work would just be the low > level RaptorQ algorithm. > > UDP based retransmit/FEC protocols are essentially impossible to develop > well without an event loop / timers. > > You can look at libsrt and librist of examples of how trying to reinvent an > event loop in threads and creating lots of bugs in the process as each lib > struggles to synchronise a complex state machine between threads. > > Adding event loop support to FFmpeg would be a great STF project. I just wanted to drop a giant +1 that event loop support in FFmpeg would be a big win (and unblock a lot of other improvements for e.g. FFmpeg's network stack IMO) and should seriously be considered for an STF project if someone has the wherewithal. It's obviously a pretty large undertaking. Best, Tristan _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-request@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".