Hi Gyan

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 10:09:14AM +0530, Gyan Doshi via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2025-09-16 03:16 am, Michael Niedermayer via ffmpeg-devel wrote:
> > > What can happen is that if an existing open trac issue is taken up for
> > > active resolution, then a new issue at Forgejo can be opened, with a
> > > reference to the trac issue. A comment can be left at trac linking to this
> > > new Forge issue, so all further activity occurs at code.ffmpeg. This would
> > > avoid any wholesale migration or duplication.
> > It can _IF_ someone spends the extra time and work.
> > How many people want to do that ?
> > And how many will do it ?
> 
> There's hardly any extra work.
> Open a single issue at forge where the title says, "trac 1234: regression in
> ..."
> Add a link to the trac issue in the body.
> Post a comment at the trac issue: "continued at
> https://code.ffmpeg.org/FFmpeg/FFmpeg/issues/12345"

Can you show me 10 cases where this has been done ?
Or even just one ?
Or even just tell me how one could reliably search for issues that continue a trac ticket ?

thx

[...]
-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

Those who are best at talking, realize last or never when they are wrong.